Archil vs Blaxel
Pick Blaxel for sandboxes that go to standby seconds after idling, wake with memory and processes intact, and can wait indefinitely. Pick Archil when many sandboxes must write the same disk, branch it in milliseconds or keep files in your own bucket; Blaxel volumes attach to one sandbox, and its shared Agent Drive is in private preview in one region.
Where Archil stands out
Storage many sandboxes write
One disk mounts read-write everywhere; Blaxel volumes attach to one sandbox at a time.
A durable sandbox filesystem
An Archil sandbox's root is a durable disk; Blaxel's is in memory and erased on delete.
Your own bucket
Disks sync to S3, GCS or R2 as ordinary objects; Blaxel volumes can't use external storage.
Archil and Blaxel, side by side
| Archil | Blaxel | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Persistent disks (POSIX and S3 API) plus Firecracker sandboxes on a disk | Sandboxes, jobs and agent hosting on microVMs, with Volumes and Agent Drive |
| When compute stops | Disks kept; pause keeps memory | Standby in about 15 s keeps memory and files; delete erases the local filesystem |
| Sandbox filesystem | A durable Archil disk | In memory, about half the allocation; not replicated |
| One store shared by many sandboxes | Yes, read-write | Volumes: one sandbox; Agent Drive: many, private preview |
| Snapshots and forks | Checkpoint 13 ms, branch 33 ms (p50), any size | Memory and file snapshots and forks, private preview |
| Your own bucket | Two-way sync with S3, GCS, R2 or S3-compatible | Not for volumes |
| Read data from outside | S3-compatible API and SDKs | Agent Drive S3 endpoint; volumes only from a sandbox or agent |
| Billing model | Active storage per GiB-month; sandbox CPU and memory per hour | Active time by memory; snapshots, images and provisioned volumes per GB-month |
- What it is
- Archil: Persistent disks (POSIX and S3 API) plus Firecracker sandboxes on a disk
- Blaxel: Sandboxes, jobs and agent hosting on microVMs, with Volumes and Agent Drive
- When compute stops
- Archil: Disks kept; pause keeps memory
- Blaxel: Standby in about 15 s keeps memory and files; delete erases the local filesystem
- Sandbox filesystem
- Archil: A durable Archil disk
- Blaxel: In memory, about half the allocation; not replicated
- One store shared by many sandboxes
- Archil: Yes, read-write
- Blaxel: Volumes: one sandbox; Agent Drive: many, private preview
- Snapshots and forks
- Archil: Checkpoint 13 ms, branch 33 ms (p50), any size
- Blaxel: Memory and file snapshots and forks, private preview
- Your own bucket
- Archil: Two-way sync with S3, GCS, R2 or S3-compatible
- Blaxel: Not for volumes
- Read data from outside
- Archil: S3-compatible API and SDKs
- Blaxel: Agent Drive S3 endpoint; volumes only from a sandbox or agent
- Billing model
- Archil: Active storage per GiB-month; sandbox CPU and memory per hour
- Blaxel: Active time by memory; snapshots, images and provisioned volumes per GB-month
Where the data lives
A Volume attaches to one sandbox at a time. Shared Agent Drive is in private preview.
Mounts read-write anywhere, outlives every sandbox, and is also an S3 bucket.
Measured
Blaxel's terms of service don't permit publishing benchmarks of its platform, so this page has none.
How they differ
Architecture
Blaxel has SDKs in Python, TypeScript and Go. The in-memory sandbox filesystem is fast but uses the memory allocation. Volumes are block storage of a provisioned size; Agent Drive is a distributed file system over Blaxel's FUSE client.
An Archil disk is an elastic POSIX file system, mounted over FUSE anywhere and reachable over S3. Archil sandboxes keep their files on a disk, not in memory.
Data durability and persistence
Blaxel sandboxes wake on the next request and aren't deleted without an expiration policy, though lower quota tiers cap lifetimes at 7 or 30 days. Blaxel calls the sandbox filesystem not replicated or durable.
An Archil write is durable when fsync returns, designed for 99.999% durability across Availability Zones. Deleting a sandbox leaves its disks untouched.
Sharing and branching
A sandbox can have one volume. Agent Drive mounts read-write or read-only in many sandboxes, only in us-was-1, and not yet on the infrastructure that provides snapshots and forks.
Archil uses shared or conditional mode for up to 5,000 clients, and branches mount anywhere as independent disks.
Bucket access and data format
How Agent Drive stores data isn't documented.
On a disk synced to your bucket, each file is an ordinary object at its path that stays if you leave Archil. Every disk is also an S3-compatible bucket, strongly consistent with the file system.
Pricing model
Blaxel: active time by allocated memory, CPU included, suspended time free; standby billed as snapshot storage, volumes on provisioned size, Agent Drive on data and operations. See Blaxel pricing.
Archil: active data per GiB-month with a lower archive rate, nothing to provision, sandboxes per vCPU-hour and GiB-hour. See Archil pricing.
Using them together
Mounting other FUSE file systems in Blaxel isn't documented. Sandbox code can still use an Archil disk over its S3 API or the SDKs.
Which one should you use?
Use Blaxel when
- sandboxes that sleep in seconds and resume with memory
- agents, jobs and sandboxes on one platform
- state that fits in memory or one attached volume
Use Archil when
- many writers on generally available shared storage
- each attempt needs its own branch, in milliseconds
- data in your own bucket as ordinary objects
- storage that grows with the data
Questions people ask
More comparisons
- Sandbox storage comparedPersistence, sharing, forks and buckets across sandbox providers.
- Archil vs E2BShared, durable disks next to E2B's pausable sandboxes
- Archil vs ModalA live shared disk next to Modal's GPUs and Volumes
- Archil vs DaytonaLocal-speed shared disks, or Daytona's included Volumes
- Archil vs Vercel SandboxOne disk many sandboxes write, or single-writer Drives
Or see every comparison, grouped by sandboxes, file systems and object storage.