How Archil compares
Archil is a disk for agents: it outlives the sandbox, many sandboxes share it, it branches in milliseconds, and it can live in your own S3, GCS or R2 bucket.
Which storage fits?
Flip what your workload needs. Capabilities come from each vendor's docs.
| Storage | Fit | Persists | Shared writes | Forks | Your bucket | npm ci, 10.5k files |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Archil disk | Fits | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 1.85 to 3.32 s |
Why
| ||||||
| Daytona Volume | Fits | Yes | Yes | No | No | Over 15 min |
Why
| ||||||
| Modal Volume | Check | Yes | Reload to see | No | Separate mount | 10.5 s |
Why
| ||||||
| E2B Volume | Check | Beta | Beta | No | No | Not measured |
Why
| ||||||
| Vercel Drive | No fit | Yes | One writer | Yes | No | 2.20 s |
Why
| ||||||
| Fly.io Sprite disk | No fit | While the Sprite exists | No | Restore in place | Not documented | 2.59 s |
Why
| ||||||
| Blaxel Volume | No fit | Yes | One sandbox | Not documented | No | Not measured |
Why
| ||||||
Sandboxes
Archil disks mount inside these sandboxes, and Archil runs its own.
- Archil vs E2BShared, durable disks next to E2B's pausable sandboxes
- Archil vs ModalA live shared disk next to Modal's GPUs and Volumes
- Archil vs DaytonaLocal-speed shared disks, or Daytona's included Volumes
- Archil vs Vercel SandboxOne disk many sandboxes write, or single-writer Drives
- Archil vs BlaxelDisks many sandboxes write, or Blaxel's instant standby
File systems
Other ways to give many machines one POSIX file system.
Object storage
Stores your app reaches over the S3 API, and how a disk sits alongside them.